But, how are we defining utilitarian? In most cases, in the U.S., when we're talking about utilitarian streets we're talking about a street that lacks congestion and that moves motor traffic quickly and efficiently. There is certainly a place for these streets. By and large, highways/freeways/interstates and major regional roads should meet this criteria and actually, they necessitate little more. Even some urban thoroughfares are perfectly good streets, functioning just as they should, in this pure utilitarian manner.
However, when we get down to the local level, be it urban or suburban, streets require quite a lot more. To use an industry term, utilitarian streets in this setting are incomplete. Here, we need to broaden our definition of utilitarian in order to maintain a street's usefulness, functionality, vibrancy, and livability. In designing these local roads, planners must consider the needs of many other public space users:
- pedestrians
- cyclists
- shop owners
- tourists
- transit passengers
- taxis
- buses
- delivery trucks
- children/elderly
Without these facilities in place, these local streets are incomplete and in that sense, not utilitarian. These streets can become perfectly useless through this biased focus. At its essence, a street is a public space, a space funded by all and meant for all to use and enjoy. They are the veins through which the lifeblood of a city or town flows, and should be perceived as such vital signs of life as our very own heartbeat.
What's the pulse of your city?
No comments:
Post a Comment